Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Adams

People v. Adams

345 N.E.2d 318, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 381 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2274
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 24, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 345 N.E.2d 318 (People v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Adams, 345 N.E.2d 318, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 381 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2274 (N.Y. 1976).

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine if there was a denial of his right to a speedy trial.

On April 15, 1968, defendant was arrested and arraigned on charges of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law, § 140.20) and possession of burglar’s tools (Penal Law, § 140.35), crimes allegedly committed earlier that day. He was indicted on these *607 charges, as well as for grand larceny, on February 26, 1970. Although defendant had been at liberty for most of the period preceding indictment, thereafter he was incarcerated. His motion to dismiss on the ground that the prosecution had failed to find an indictment (former Code Grim Pro, § 667) was denied as moot on May 12, 1970.

In January of 1971, defendant served a pro se motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute upon the District Attorney, premised upon an alleged denial of a speedy trial. Nothing in the record indicates that the motion was docketed with the court for judicial disposition. Thereafter, on April 12, 1972, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted burglary in the third degree in satisfaction of the instant indictment and another charging him with possession of a weapon. At the plea and sentencing proceedings, no mention of the pro se motion for dismissal was made.

In the Appellate Division, defendant, for the first time, asserted his alleged deprivation but the judgment was affirmed, with two Justices dissenting and being of the view that the case should be remitted for a hearing on the reasonableness of the delay.

The right to a speedy trial may be waived but the waiver must be both knowingly and voluntarily made (People v White, 32 NY2d 393, 399). It can hardly be said that defendant, in light of his own motion to dismiss, was unaware of his right and, not having raised the issue in the court of first instance, there is no error to be reviewed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Walker
259 A.D.2d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Woods
177 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Moissett
564 N.E.2d 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Boyd
133 A.D.2d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Martinez
126 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. McShaw
122 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Trevino
114 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Ruiz
107 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Lawrence
474 N.E.2d 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Juhans
126 Misc. 2d 868 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Paquette
103 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Jordan
466 N.E.2d 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
James Barber v. Charles Scully, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility
731 F.2d 1073 (Second Circuit, 1984)
People v. Pratt
99 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Allyn
92 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Clary
420 N.E.2d 96 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Watts
78 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Rodriguez
407 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Crump
74 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Whisby
400 N.E.2d 286 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 N.E.2d 318, 38 N.Y.2d 605, 381 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-adams-ny-1976.