People v. Boyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Boyd

128 A.D.2d 886, 513 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44562

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 886 (People v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boyd, 128 A.D.2d 886, 513 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered November 8, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543). In addition, under the circumstances of this case and in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the single reference to his postarrest silence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237; People v Moore, 125 AD2d 501). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered November 8, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543). In addition, under the circumstances of this case and in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, the single reference to his postarrest silence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237; People v Moore, 125 AD2d 501). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 886, 513 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boyd-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack