People v. Acosta

185 A.D.2d 242
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Acosta. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D.2d 505

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered May 1, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

Contrary to the contentions raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief, we conclude that the defendant fully understood the nature and terms of his negotiated plea and that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Acosta, 185 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 242 (People v. Acosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)