People v. Abruzzi
This text of 364 N.E.2d 1342 (People v. Abruzzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I would reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of conviction for the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree for the reasons stated in the opinion by Judge Joseph Jiudice of the Dutchess County Court. I also agree with so much of the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice James D. Hopkins at the Appellate Division as states that the doctrine of the taint of the poisonous tree should not be extended to include evidence of the personal observation by a police officer of a crime committed in his presence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
364 N.E.2d 1342, 42 N.Y.2d 813, 396 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abruzzi-ny-1977.