People v. Abreu

24 A.D.3d 274, 808 N.Y.S.2d 624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Abreu. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 A.D.2d 685

Opinion

[275]*275Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John N. Byrne, J., at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered November 25, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of the severity of his lawful sentence (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]). Were we to find that defendant’s argument is not foreclosed, we would find that defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of People v Behlog (74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision applicable to defendant’s situation applies only to crimes committed after its effective date (People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005]). Moreover, and, in any event, the amelioration doctrine could not apply where, as here, defendant was sentenced before the new law’s effective date (People v Walker, 81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Abreu, 24 A.D.3d 274, 808 N.Y.S.2d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

24 A.D.3d 274 (People v. Abreu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
623 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Behlog
543 N.E.2d 69 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Nelson
21 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)