People v. Abreu
This text of 29 A.D.3d 336 (People v. Abreu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered March 21, 2005, resentencing [337]*337defendant, upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant, who was resentenced from a term of 15 years to life to a term of 12 years pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), claims he is also entitled to have his conviction reduced to second-degree possession based on the amelioration doctrine of People v Behlog (74 NY2d 237 [1989]) and the new law’s change in the weight requirement for first-degree possession. We reject this argument, because the amelioration doctrine does not apply (People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005], lv granted 6 NY3d 757 [2005]), and because, even if it did apply, defendant’s resentencing would not place him, for such purpose, in the posture of a person being newly sentenced (People v Quinones, 22 AD3d 218 [2005]).
We perceive no basis for a further reduction of the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 336, 813 N.Y.S.2d 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-abreu-nyappdiv-2006.