People ex rel. Winterkamp v. Matt

263 A.D. 795, 31 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969

Opinion

Final order and judgment affirmed, with costs. All" concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that it was error to exclude evidence of profits derived by the respondent arising from a business conducted by him on the premises. The evidence was competent on the value of the use and enjoyment of the premises. (People ex rel. Powers v. Kalbfleisch, 25 App. Div. 432, 436; affd., 156 N. Y. 678.) (The final order and judgment reduces an assessment.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Winterkamp v. Matt, 263 A.D. 795, 31 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

263 A.D. 795 (People ex rel. Winterkamp v. Matt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Powers v. . Kalbfleisch
50 N.E. 1119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
People ex rel. Powers v. Kalbfleisch
25 A.D. 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)