People ex rel. Wilson v. Hanslmaier

232 A.D.2d 702, 648 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10005
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 702 (People ex rel. Wilson v. Hanslmaier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Wilson v. Hanslmaier, 232 A.D.2d 702, 648 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered December 19, 1995 in Sullivan County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner, an inmate at Woodbourne Correctional Facility in Sullivan County, commenced this habeas corpus proceeding challenging respondent’s calculation of his conditional release date. Supreme Court denied the petition, finding that petitioner was not eligible for conditional release until August 8, 2000. Even if respondent did miscalculate petitioner’s conditional release date and he were eligible for conditional release at the present time, petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release from prison. Consequently, his request for habeas corpus relief is inappropriate and his petition should be dismissed on that basis (see, People ex rel. Travis v Coombe, 219 AD2d 881; People ex rel. Hatzman v Kuhlmann, 173 AD2d 895; People ex rel. Robinson v Fogg, 105 AD2d 521). In any event, were we to convert this proceeding to a CPLR article 78 proceeding and consider the merits (see, People ex rel. Gonzalez v New York State Bd. of Parole, 103 AD2d 855), we would find that Supreme Court properly denied his petition.

Cardona, P. J., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Justice v. Racette
111 A.D.3d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People ex rel. Price v. West
30 A.D.3d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People ex rel. Richardson v. West
24 A.D.3d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Vasquez v. Filion
22 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Daniels v. Beaver
303 A.D.2d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People ex rel. Emm v. Hollins
299 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People ex rel. Victory v. Herbert
277 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Leggett v. Leonardo
274 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. Buroughs v. Travis
273 A.D.2d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People ex rel. McKnight v. Meloni
181 Misc. 2d 422 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D.2d 702, 648 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-wilson-v-hanslmaier-nyappdiv-1996.