People ex rel. Walsh v. Vincent
This text of 50 A.D.2d 914 (People ex rel. Walsh v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 17, 1975, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs; petition granted with prejudice; and petitioner is restored to parole under the conditions heretofore in effect. Under the circumstances, since petitioner’s right to a prompt final revocation hearing was violated, the relief requested in the petition should have been granted with prejudice. In Matter of Beattie v New York State Bd. of Parole (47 AD2d 656) this court said: "Here we are merely directing that petitioner be afforded an immediate hearing because that can be done without affecting his rights. However, the parole board should be aware of the fact that continued indifference to the rights of defendants to [915]*915obtain prompt revocation hearings may, in the future, result in the vacatur, with prejudice, of warrants in all such cases.” Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 914, 377 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-walsh-v-vincent-nyappdiv-1975.