People ex rel. v. Dalsheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. v. Dalsheim

70 A.D.2d 603, 416 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 603 (People ex rel. v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. v. Dalsheim, 70 A.D.2d 603, 416 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 16, 1978, which, upon a decision granting the application to the extent of directing that he be given a prompt final parole revocation hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and charge of violating parole dismissed, with prejudice. The delay between October, 1975 and March, 1977 in granting petitioner a final parole revocation hearing was inexcusable, and must result in a dismissal of the charges against him, with prejudice (see People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 50 AD2d 914, affd 40 NY2d 1049). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 16, 1978, which, upon a decision granting the application to the extent of directing that he be given a prompt final parole revocation hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and charge of violating parole dismissed, with prejudice. The delay between October, 1975 and March, 1977 in granting petitioner a final parole revocation hearing was inexcusable, and must result in a dismissal of the charges against him, with prejudice (see People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 50 AD2d 914, affd 40 NY2d 1049). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 603, 416 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack