People ex rel. Udell v. Queens County District Attorney
This text of 130 A.D.3d 950 (People ex rel. Udell v. Queens County District Attorney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to set bail upon Queens County indictment No. 1719/2013.
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Rivera, J.R, Hall, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A.D.3d 950, 12 N.Y.S.3d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-udell-v-queens-county-district-attorney-nyappdiv-2015.