People ex rel. Udell v. Queens County District Attorney
113 A.D.3d 706, 978 N.Y.2d 703
Opinion
The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Udell v. Queens County District Attorney, 113 A.D.3d 706, 978 N.Y.2d 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 706 (People ex rel. Udell v. Queens County District Attorney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)