People ex rel. Thompson v. Kralik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Thompson v. Kralik

250 A.D.2d 789, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 789 (People ex rel. Thompson v. Kralik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Thompson v. Kralik, 250 A.D.2d 789, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an oral decision of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), rendered on March 17, 1997, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal of the Supreme Court’s oral decision must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an oral decision (see, Scholl v Heidi’s Delicatessen, 232 AD2d 396; Blaine v Meyer, 126 AD2d 508; Fiore v Fiore, 6 AD2d 834). In any event, if we [790]*790were to review the matter, we would find that the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the writ since the appellant had completed his sentence. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an oral decision of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), rendered on March 17, 1997, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal of the Supreme Court’s oral decision must be dismissed because no appeal lies from an oral decision (see, Scholl v Heidi’s Delicatessen, 232 AD2d 396; Blaine v Meyer, 126 AD2d 508; Fiore v Fiore, 6 AD2d 834). In any event, if we [790]*790were to review the matter, we would find that the Supreme Court correctly dismissed the writ since the appellant had completed his sentence. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 789, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-thompson-v-kralik-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack