Blaine v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Blaine v. Meyer

126 A.D.2d 508, 510 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41649

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1987·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Meyer appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a purported order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated November 19, 1985, as granted the plaintiffs motion for reargument, and upon reargument, granted the plaintiff a general trial preference.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

A dismissal of the appeal is warranted since "[t]he purported order is nothing more than an unsigned transcript of an oral decision and does not comply with CPLR 2219 (a)” (see, Ojeda v Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717-718). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Meyer appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a purported order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated November 19, 1985, as granted the plaintiffs motion for reargument, and upon reargument, granted the plaintiff a general trial preference.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

A dismissal of the appeal is warranted since "[t]he purported order is nothing more than an unsigned transcript of an oral decision and does not comply with CPLR 2219 (a)” (see, Ojeda v Metropolitan Playhouse, 120 AD2d 717-718). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Blaine v. Meyer, 126 A.D.2d 508, 510 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

126 A.D.2d 508 (Blaine v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related