People ex rel. Standik v. Ashworth

9 Misc. 2d 444, 66 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1482
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 1943·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

John E. MoG-eehan, J.

The writ is dismissed and the relator is remanded. Notwithstanding the remarks of the sentencing court at the time sentence was imposed, this court cannot adjudicate that the sentencing court legally found the defendant beyond the realm of reformation contemplated by the Parole Commission Law (Correction Law, art. 7-A). An appellate court reviewing the matter of the sentence upon a direct appeal might arrive at a different conclusion but this court upon this [445] application, cannot act in the capacity of an appellate court as to the sentence imposed and accordingly finds itself bound by the rule of law that the sentencing court pronouncing the sentence imposed impliedly found the defendant not to be insane or mentally or physically incapable of being substantially benefited by the correctional and reformatory purposes of the sentence imposed by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Standik v. Ashworth, 9 Misc. 2d 444, 66 N.Y.S.2d 547, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1482 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1943).

9 Misc. 2d 444 (People ex rel. Standik v. Ashworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Kern v. Silberglitt
149 N.E.2d 76 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
People ex rel. Granza v. Johnston
9 Misc. 2d 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
People ex rel. Schurman v. Ashworth
9 Misc. 2d 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
People ex rel. Halle v. Ashworth
9 Misc. 2d 451 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)
People ex rel. Pastore v. Ashworth
9 Misc. 2d 445 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)