People ex rel. Halle v. Ashworth

9 Misc. 2d 451, 67 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1436
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 13, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 9 Misc. 2d 451 (People ex rel. Halle v. Ashworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Halle v. Ashworth, 9 Misc. 2d 451, 67 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1436 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1944).

Opinion

Behjamiu P. Schreiber, J.

This writ of habeas corpus tests whether a parolee, in this case under a life sentence, may be sentenced to an indeterminate term upon conviction of a misdemeanor (Correction Law, §§ 203, 204). It appears that, upon separate misdemeanor convictions, two consecutive indeterminate sentences may not simultaneously be imposed (People ex rel. Gordon v. Ashworth, 290 N. Y. 285), and in consequence it has been held that a parolee under an indeterminate term may not be sentenced, upon another misdemeanor conviction, to another indeterminate term until the expiration of the first such term (People ex rel. Bernard v. Ashworth, 43 N. Y. S. 2d 366).

In my opinion, however, it is clear that a parolee under a fixed term may, in such case, be sentenced to an indeterminate term as a matter of law (People ex rel. Pellicano v. Ashworth, 265 App. Div. 853). Loss of civil rights (Penal Law, § 510) or civil death (Penal Law, § 511) cannot reasonably be said to preclude such sentence (cf. Matter of Lindewall, 287 N. Y. 347; Avery v. Everett, 110 N. Y. 317; People v. Feolo, 284 N. Y. 381) and, under the authorities, the possibility of benefit by such sentence is to be conclusively presumed from the very sentence, however incongruous (People v. Thompson, 251 N. Y. 428; People ex rel. Standik v. Ashworth, 9 Misc 2d 444, affd. 266 App. Div. 775; People ex rel. Pastore v. Ashworth, 9 Misc 2d 445).

Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGinnis v. Kross
15 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
People Ex Rel. Kern v. Silberglitt
149 N.E.2d 76 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
People ex rel. Scott v. McDonnell
9 Misc. 2d 443 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
People ex rel. Granza v. Johnston
9 Misc. 2d 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
People ex rel. Schurman v. Ashworth
9 Misc. 2d 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Misc. 2d 451, 67 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1944 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-halle-v-ashworth-nysupct-1944.