People ex rel. Smith v. Graham
This text of 109 A.D.3d 1113 (People ex rel. Smith v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered December 21, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 70. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus. In support thereof, he contended, inter alia, that he was improperly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender, the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law former § 130.50 [1]), and he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the petition. Those contentions could have been raised on direct appeal or by a motion pursuant to CPL article 440, and thus habeas corpus relief is unavailable (see People ex rel. Donato v Kirkpatrick, 73 AD3d 1450, 1451 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 707 [2010]; People ex rel. Mills v Poole, 55 AD3d 1289, 1290 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 712 [2008]). Present — Scudder, EJ, Feradotto, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.3d 1113, 971 N.Y.S.2d 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-smith-v-graham-nyappdiv-2013.