DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
501 KAH 13-00585 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. DWIGHT M. DILBERT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARK BRADT, SUPERINTENDENT, ATTICA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), entered January 2, 2013 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support the conviction of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2] [depraved indifference]) inasmuch as the evidence established that his acts against the victim were intentional and manifested an intent to kill. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the petition. “ ‘Habeas corpus relief is not an appropriate remedy for asserting claims that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion’ ” (People ex rel. Martinez v Graham, 98 AD3d 1312, 1312, lv denied 20 NY3d 853; see People ex rel. Smith v Graham, 109 AD3d 1113, 1113; People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 96 AD3d 1423, 1423, lv denied 19 NY3d 813).
Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK (DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.