DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 2014
DocketKAH 13-00585
StatusPublished

This text of DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK (DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

501 KAH 13-00585 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. DWIGHT M. DILBERT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARK BRADT, SUPERINTENDENT, ATTICA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), entered January 2, 2013 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support the conviction of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2] [depraved indifference]) inasmuch as the evidence established that his acts against the victim were intentional and manifested an intent to kill. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the petition. “ ‘Habeas corpus relief is not an appropriate remedy for asserting claims that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion’ ” (People ex rel. Martinez v Graham, 98 AD3d 1312, 1312, lv denied 20 NY3d 853; see People ex rel. Smith v Graham, 109 AD3d 1113, 1113; People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 96 AD3d 1423, 1423, lv denied 19 NY3d 813).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Lewis v. Graham
96 A.D.3d 1423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People ex rel. Martinez v. Graham
98 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People ex rel. Smith v. Graham
109 A.D.3d 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DILBERT, DWIGHT M. v. BRADT, MARK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilbert-dwight-m-v-bradt-mark-nyappdiv-2014.