People ex rel. Robinson v. Scully
This text of 122 A.D.2d 290 (People ex rel. Robinson v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated June 4,. 1985, which, after a hearing, dismissed the proceeding.
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner’s claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial or on appeal do not entitle him to habeas corpus relief because those claims, if meritorious, would, at most, require a new trial or new appeal and not a direction that he be immediately released from custody (see, e.g., Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 [291]*291NY2d 648, 649; People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901, 903). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.2d 290, 505 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-robinson-v-scully-nyappdiv-1986.