People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction

New York Court of Appeals

People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction

454 N.E.2d 1309, 60 N.Y.2d 648, 467 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3349

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1983·Published·Cited by 68 cases

Opinion

opinion of the court

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs. Relator is not entitled to habeas corpus relief because the only remedy to which he would be entitled would be a new trial or new appeal, and not a direction that he be immediately released from custody (People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

opinion of the court

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs. Relator is not entitled to habeas corpus relief because the only remedy to which he would be entitled would be a new trial or new appeal, and not a direction that he be immediately released from custody (People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction, 454 N.E.2d 1309, 60 N.Y.2d 648, 467 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3349 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

454 N.E.2d 1309 (People ex rel. Kaplan v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related