People ex rel. Roberts v. Brann

2020 NY Slip Op 2910, 121 N.Y.S.3d 901, 183 A.D.3d 790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 19, 2020
Docket2020-03554
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 2910 (People ex rel. Roberts v. Brann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Roberts v. Brann, 2020 NY Slip Op 2910, 121 N.Y.S.3d 901, 183 A.D.3d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People ex rel. Roberts v Brann (2020 NY Slip Op 02910)
People v Pierre
2020 NY Slip Op 02910
Decided on May 19, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 19, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2020-03554

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Sam Roberts, on behalf of Quincy Pierre, petitioner,

v

Cynthia Brann, respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Sam Roberts pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Seth M. Lieberman and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Quincy Pierre on his own recognizance or to set bail upon Kings County Indictment No. 6026/19.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the detention of Quincy Pierre. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the most recent determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230; see also People ex rel. Dieckmann v Warden , ___AD3d ___, 2020 NY Slip Op 02272 [2d Dept 2020]). We note that Quincy Pierre, if he be so advised, may make an application for a change in securing order "[u]pon any occasion" (CPL 510.20[1]).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Dieckmann v. Warden
2020 NY Slip Op 2272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 2910, 121 N.Y.S.3d 901, 183 A.D.3d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-roberts-v-brann-nyappdiv-2020.