People ex rel. Dieckmann v. Warden

2020 NY Slip Op 2272, 120 N.Y.S.3d 633, 182 A.D.3d 555
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 9, 2020
Docket2020-02928
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 2272 (People ex rel. Dieckmann v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Dieckmann v. Warden, 2020 NY Slip Op 2272, 120 N.Y.S.3d 633, 182 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People ex rel. Dieckmann v Warden (2020 NY Slip Op 02272)
People v Warden
2020 NY Slip Op 02272
Decided on April 9, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 9, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2020-02928

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Christina M. Dieckmann, on behalf of Delon Hughes, petitioner,

v

Warden, West Facility, etc., respondent.


Brooklyn Defender Services, Brooklyn, NY (Christina M. Dieckmann pro se of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Gwen Barnes, Ann Bordley, and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Delon Hughes on his own recognizance or for bail reduction upon Kings County Indictment Nos. 962/19 and 2240/19.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The most recent bail determination did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230).

To the extent that the petitioner contends that Delon Hughes's detention is illegal because he is being detained with a deliberate indifference to unsafe conditions and to his medical needs, this claim raises questions of fact that are more appropriately considered in the first instance by the Supreme Court, which can hold evidentiary hearings and whose findings of fact and conclusions of law may be reviewed on an appropriate appellate record (see People ex rel. Grossfeld v Brann, ___ AD3d ___ [decided herewith]).

Accordingly, we dismiss the writ.

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., HINDS-RADIX, MALTESE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Kwan v. Warden
2024 NY Slip Op 05551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People ex rel. Carroll v. Keyser
2020 NY Slip Op 3169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People ex rel. Roberts v. Brann
2020 NY Slip Op 2910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People ex rel. Mulry v. Franchi
2020 NY Slip Op 2909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 2272, 120 N.Y.S.3d 633, 182 A.D.3d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dieckmann-v-warden-nyappdiv-2020.