People Ex Rel. Richards v. Kirby

New York Court of Appeals

People Ex Rel. Richards v. Kirby

50 N.E.2d 551, 291 N.Y. 75, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1066

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 20, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 N.E.2d 551 (People Ex Rel. Richards v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People Ex Rel. Richards v. Kirby, 50 N.E.2d 551, 291 N.Y. 75, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1066 (N.Y. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator, acting as his own attorney, attempts to appeal direct to this court from the dismissal at Special Term of his writ of habeas corpus. Such a direct appeal can be taken where ‘ ‘ the only question involved on the appeal is the validity of a statutory provision of the state or of the United States under the constitution of the state or of the United States; and on any such appeal only the constitutional question shall be considered and determined by the court.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd, 4.) On his attempted direct appeal here relator has raised other questions. He argues that sections 1699, 1942 and 1943 of the Penal Law were misconstrued by the court which sentenced him originally with the result, as he contends, that he was sentenced as a fourth offender instead of as a third offender. Serious though those questions may be, they cannot be answered on this appeal.

*77 The appeal should be dismissed. (See 291 N. Y. 705.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Bippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Relator, acting as his own attorney, attempts to appeal direct to this court from the dismissal at Special Term of his writ of habeas corpus. Such a direct appeal can be taken where ‘ ‘ the only question involved on the appeal is the validity of a statutory provision of the state or of the United States under the constitution of the state or of the United States; and on any such appeal only the constitutional question shall be considered and determined by the court.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd, 4.) On his attempted direct appeal here relator has raised other questions. He argues that sections 1699, 1942 and 1943 of the Penal Law were misconstrued by the court which sentenced him originally with the result, as he contends, that he was sentenced as a fourth offender instead of as a third offender. Serious though those questions may be, they cannot be answered on this appeal.

*77 The appeal should be dismissed. (See 291 N. Y. 705.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Bippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 N.E.2d 551, 291 N.Y. 75, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-richards-v-kirby-ny-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack