People ex rel. Perez v. Dalsheim
This text of 64 A.D.2d 987 (People ex rel. Perez v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 28, 1977, which granted his application solely to the extent of directing the respondent to afford him a final parole revocation hearing at the next scheduled meeting of the Parole Board. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On July 5, 1977 a warrant for parole violation was lodged against the petitioner. On August 4, 1977 a preliminary parole revocation hearing was held. On October 27, 1977 Special Term directed that the petitioner be given his final hearing. The hearing was held on November 22, 1977, the first available date subsequent to the court’s order. Inasmuch as this record reveals no prejudice to the petitioner as a result of the time lapse, the almost four-month delay from issuance of the parole violation warrant to the date of the final revocation hearing does not require a reversal (cf. People ex rel. Clinkscales v Bombard, 56 AD2d 940). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 A.D.2d 987, 408 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-perez-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1978.