People ex rel. Clinkscales v. Bombard
This text of 56 A.D.2d 940 (People ex rel. Clinkscales v. Bombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered June 14, 1976, which dismissed the petition and remanded him to the custody of respondent Bombard. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. At the time petitioner was first taken into custody, he admitted the original parole violations, and probable cause was found at the preliminary hearing. Grounds appeared for two additional violations. Following a supplemental report, petitioner was served with the charges prior [941]*941to the final parole revocation hearing. In the light of the admissions and the time required for the supplemental report, the three and one-half month delay from the commencement of custody was not unreasonable. (Cf. People ex rel. Royster v Bombard, 55 AD2d 940; People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 40 NY2d 1049.) We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 940, 392 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-clinkscales-v-bombard-nyappdiv-1977.