People ex rel. Pandolfo v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Pandolfo v. Jackson

141 A.D.2d 686, 529 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6627

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1988·Published

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 27, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding, and, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated July 10, 1987, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

[687]*687Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as it was superseded by the order, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 1987 is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Inasmuch as the petitioner has been restored to parole status, his claim that he is entitled to that relief because of the failure to timely notify him of the outcome of the final parole revocation hearing is now academic (cf., People ex rel. Ali v Sperbeck, 66 AD2d 827). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 27, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding, and, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated July 10, 1987, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

[687]*687Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as it was superseded by the order, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 10, 1987 is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Inasmuch as the petitioner has been restored to parole status, his claim that he is entitled to that relief because of the failure to timely notify him of the outcome of the final parole revocation hearing is now academic (cf., People ex rel. Ali v Sperbeck, 66 AD2d 827). Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Pandolfo v. Jackson, 141 A.D.2d 686, 529 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

141 A.D.2d 686 (People ex rel. Pandolfo v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related