People ex rel. Nehru Ali v. Sperbeck
This text of 66 A.D.2d 827 (People ex rel. Nehru Ali v. Sperbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 3, 1976, which dismissed the proceeding. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner’s liberty is no longer being restrained in view of his release on parole. Accordingly, he is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus (see CPLR 7002, subd [a]; People ex rel. Yacobellis v McKendrick, 28 NY2d 808; People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Butts v McMann, 24 NY2d 772; People ex rel. Jones v Ternullo, 52 AD2d 631; People ex rel. Christian v Vincent, 49 AD2d 914). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A.D.2d 827, 411 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-nehru-ali-v-sperbeck-nyappdiv-1978.