People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott
1 How. Pr. 247
Opinion
Decided, that a director, or a corporator, had a right at all reasonable times, to examine the books, records, and papers of the company. Mandamus granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott, 1 How. Pr. 247 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 How. Pr. 247 (People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Demos v. Capps & Co.
28 Misc. 2d 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.
127 N.E.2d 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)
People ex rel. McInnes v. Columbia Paper Bag Co.
103 A.D. 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Matter of Steinway
53 N.E. 1103 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
In re Steinway
31 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)