People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott

1 How. Pr. 247
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 1 How. Pr. 247 (People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Onderdonk v. Mott, 1 How. Pr. 247 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Decided, that a director, or a corporator, had a right at all reasonable times, to examine the books, records, and papers of the company. Mandamus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demos v. Capps & Co.
28 Misc. 2d 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.
127 N.E.2d 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)
People ex rel. McInnes v. Columbia Paper Bag Co.
103 A.D. 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Matter of Steinway
53 N.E. 1103 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
In re Steinway
31 A.D. 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-onderdonk-v-mott-nysupct-1845.