People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury

153 N.Y.S. 541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 A.D. 428
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1915·No. No. 71/2·Published

Opinion

JOHN M. KELLOGG, J.

The question presented is whether the appellant’s railroad crossing of canal lands is a special franchise. In other words, whether canal lands are to be deemed public places within the fair-meaning of subdivision 3 of section 2 of the Tax Law. The question was considered in People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Woodbury, 140 App. Div. 850, 125 N. Y. Supp. 728; Id. 208 N. Y. 421, 102 N. E. 565, 566; Id., 140 App. Div. 945, 125 N. Y. Supp. 730; Id., 208 N. Y. 425, 102 N. E. 565, 566. In those cases it was considered that the crossing of relator’s railroad over such lands was a special franchise.

The order is therefore affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury, 153 N.Y.S. 541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

153 N.Y.S. 541 (People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. N.Y.C., Etc., R.R. Co. v. . Woodbury
102 N.E. 565 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury
140 A.D. 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury
208 N.Y. 421 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury
125 N.Y.S. 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)