Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People ex rel. Natale v. Murdock

People ex rel. Natale v. Murdock

275 A.D.2d 676
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 676 (People ex rel. Natale v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Natale v. Murdock, 275 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

The evidence sustains the finding of the board of standards and appeals that the use in question was a saw or planing mill within the meaning of the zoning resolution. (Matter of Gillespie, Inc., v. Olena, 258 N. Y. 535; Red Hook Cold Storage Co. v. Department of Labor of State of New York, 295 N. Y. 1.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Red Hook Cold Storage Co. v. Department of Labor
64 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Matter of Earl A. Gillespie, Inc. v. Olena
180 N.E. 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-natale-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1949.