Matter of Earl A. Gillespie, Inc. v. Olena
This text of 180 N.E. 321 (Matter of Earl A. Gillespie, Inc. v. Olena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the evidence sustains the finding of the Board of Zoning Appeals that the proposed building was a saw mill or planing mill within the meaning of the zoning ordinance; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
180 N.E. 321, 258 N.Y. 535, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-earl-a-gillespie-inc-v-olena-ny-1931.