People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden
This text of 213 A.D.2d 729 (People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Kings County Indictment No. 12205/94.
Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
We previously held that the determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, fixing bail at $100,000, was not an improvident exercise of discretion and did not violate " 'constitutional or statutory standards’ ” (People ex rel. Murphy v Warden, 210 AD2d 190, citing People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). The alleged new circumstances set forth in this successive application for a writ of habeas corpus do not warrant a different result. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 729, 624 N.Y.S.2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-murphy-v-warden-nyappdiv-1995.