People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden

210 A.D.2d 190, 619 N.Y.S.2d 962
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 190 (People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden, 210 A.D.2d 190, 619 N.Y.S.2d 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Kings County Indictment No. 12205/94.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and in opposition thereto, and after hearing oral argument in support of the application and in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Kruger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Lawrence, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Murphy v. Warden
213 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.2d 190, 619 N.Y.S.2d 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-murphy-v-warden-nyappdiv-1994.