People ex rel. McDonald v. Warden, New York City House of Detention for Men
This text of 310 N.E.2d 537 (People ex rel. McDonald v. Warden, New York City House of Detention for Men) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. In a pending criminal action, habeas corpus brought on the ground of denial of the right to a speedy trial generally should be denied, without necessarily reaching the merits, when the action is brought to trial. Because habeas corpus depends upon a clear right to a discharge and is a summary remedy, its denial does not preclude raising again of the issue of a right to a speedy trial in the criminal action or any appeal therein provided the issue has been preserved by proper objection, motion or otherwise.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 N.E.2d 537, 34 N.Y.2d 554, 354 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mcdonald-v-warden-new-york-city-house-of-detention-for-men-ny-1974.