People ex rel. Braxton v. Warden

254 A.D.2d 381, 678 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10738
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), dated July 31, 1995, which denied his application for the issuance of a writ.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner’s contention that his indictment should be dismissed because he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial may not be raised in this habeas corpus proceeding, but rather could be raised as an issue on his appeal from his judgment of conviction (see, People ex rel. Chakwin v Warden, 63 NY2d 120; People ex rel. McDonald v Warden, 34 NY2d 554; Matter of Kassebaum v Ali al-Rahman, 212 AD2d 482). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Braxton v. Warden, 254 A.D.2d 381, 678 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 381 (People ex rel. Braxton v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Allen v. Maribel
107 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People ex rel. La Joy v. Bezrutczyk
12 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)