People ex rel. Kitt v. Dalsheim
This text of 67 A.D.2d 934 (People ex rel. Kitt v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 22, 1978, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. From the record it appears the final revocation hearing was scheduled within the statutorily prescribed period (see Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 3, par [f], cl [i]), and that the short adjournment was due to [935]*935petitioner’s conduct in misleading the hearing officer as to his desire for the assistance of counsel. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D.2d 934, 412 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kitt-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1979.