People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin

135 A.D.2d 676, 522 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52619

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 135 A.D.2d 676 (People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin, 135 A.D.2d 676, 522 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated November 20, 1984, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and remanded him to the custody of the respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated November 20, 1984, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and remanded him to the custody of the respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 676, 522 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-harris-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack