People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated November 20, 1984, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and remanded him to the custody of the respondent.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
135 A.D.2d 676 (People ex rel. Harris v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.