In re David G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re David G.

248 A.D.2d 470, 669 N.Y.S.2d 514

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 470 (In re David G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re David G., 248 A.D.2d 470, 669 N.Y.S.2d 514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In two proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate the putative father’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the putative father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), both dated July 30, 1996, which, after a hearing, terminated his parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the two children to the petitioner St. Christopher-Ottilie and to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [471]*471withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of N. Children, 169 AD2d 834; People ex rel. Harris v Coughlin, 135 AD2d 676).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In two proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate the putative father’s parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the putative father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), both dated July 30, 1996, which, after a hearing, terminated his parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the two children to the petitioner St. Christopher-Ottilie and to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [471]*471withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of N. Children, 169 AD2d 834; People ex rel. Harris v Coughlin, 135 AD2d 676).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 470, 669 N.Y.S.2d 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-g-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack