People ex rel. Finney v. Follette
This text of 37 A.D.2d 575 (People ex rel. Finney v. Follette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals .from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 18, 1970, which dismissed the writ. On the court’s own motion the notice of appeal is amended so as to state that the appeal is to this court. Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the ground that no reason of practicality or necessity was asserted to justify review of the matters raised in this proceeding while relator’s appeal from the subject judgment of conviction was pending (People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N Y 2d 257, 262; People ex rel. Bray v. Deegan, 32 A D 2d 940; People ex rel. Singleton v. Deegan, 31 A D 2d 769; People ex rel. Blyden v. Denno, 28 A D 2d 683; People ex rel. Colon v. Deegan, 34 A D 2d 799). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 A.D.2d 575, 322 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-finney-v-follette-nyappdiv-1971.