People ex rel. Dumary v. Van Alstyne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Dumary v. Van Alstyne

65 N.Y.S. 516, 53 A.D. 626

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y.S. 516 (People ex rel. Dumary v. Van Alstyne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Dumary v. Van Alstyne, 65 N.Y.S. 516, 53 A.D. 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This writ must be quashel for the reasons and on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice MERWIN in a proceeding similarly entitled in this court at this term. 65 N. Y. Supp. 451. The action of the board here complained of is not binding upon the relator, and is not reviewable by certiorari.

Writ of certiorari quashed, without costs, upon the ground that the action of the board complained of is not reviewable by certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This writ must be quashel for the reasons and on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice MERWIN in a proceeding similarly entitled in this court at this term. 65 N. Y. Supp. 451. The action of the board here complained of is not binding upon the relator, and is not reviewable by certiorari.

Writ of certiorari quashed, without costs, upon the ground that the action of the board complained of is not reviewable by certiorari.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.Y.S. 516, 53 A.D. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-dumary-v-van-alstyne-nyappdiv-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack