People ex rel. Curtis v. Hogeboom
This text of 185 A.D. 777 (People ex rel. Curtis v. Hogeboom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think that the construction of chapter 476 of the Laws of 1909 — an amendment to the charter of the city of Mount Vernon
We agree with the conclusion reached by Keogh, J., at Special Term, and for the reasons stated in his opinion handed down upon denial of the motion. The order is affirmed, but without costs.
Jenks, P. J., Putnam, Blackmae, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.
Order affirmed, without costs.
Laws of 1892, chap. 182, § 206e, added by Laws of 1903, chap. 402, as amd. by Laws of 1905, chap. 85, and Laws of 1909, chap. 476.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 A.D. 777, 173 N.Y.S. 417, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-curtis-v-hogeboom-nyappdiv-1918.