People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend

112 N.E. 334, 218 N.Y. 615, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1104
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that Bassi, the paroled prisoner, was a. necessary party to this proceeding (Matter of Jones v. Willcox, 80 App. Div. 167, 170; Powell v. People, 214 Ill. 475; R. v. Bankes, 3 Burr. 1452), and the failure to make him a party leaves us unable to determine the validity of the parole.

*616 The order should he affirmed without prejudice to the renewal of the' application when the proper parties are before the court.

Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend, 112 N.E. 334, 218 N.Y. 615, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1104 (N.Y. 1916).

112 N.E. 334 (People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Green v. Miller
162 N.E. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Green v. Miller
249 N.Y. 88 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Lewis v. Carter
175 A.D. 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend
112 N.E. 724 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)