Home/New York Court of Appeals/People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend

People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend

112 N.E. 334, 218 N.Y. 615, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1104
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 18, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 112 N.E. 334 (People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend, 112 N.E. 334, 218 N.Y. 615, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1104 (N.Y. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that Bassi, the paroled prisoner, was a. necessary party to this proceeding (Matter of Jones v. Willcox, 80 App. Div. 167, 170; Powell v. People, 214 Ill. 475; R. v. Bankes, 3 Burr. 1452), and the failure to make him a party leaves us unable to determine the validity of the parole.

*616 The order should he affirmed without prejudice to the renewal of the' application when the proper parties are before the court.

Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Green v. Miller
162 N.E. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Green v. Miller
249 N.Y. 88 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Lewis v. Carter
175 A.D. 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
People Ex Rel. Cropsey v. . Townsend
112 N.E. 724 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 N.E. 334, 218 N.Y. 615, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-cropsey-v-townsend-ny-1916.