People ex rel. Cooley v. Fitz-Gerald
41 Mich. 2
Opinion
The charter of Port Huron in force when this controversy began made the common council the final judges as to the election of its members. It was not contemplated that such questions should be subjected to the delays and formalities of judicial proceedings. No doubt fairness requires that the rights of parties in such cases shall not be disposed of without giving them a chance to be heard, but although the course taken, if the papers are true, was very censurable, we' cannot review it.
Mandamus refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Cooley v. Fitz-Gerald, 41 Mich. 2 (Mich. 1879).
41 Mich. 2 (People ex rel. Cooley v. Fitz-Gerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Connor Berdy v. Sonja Buffa
928 N.W.2d 204 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2019)
Crossman v. Hanson
143 N.W.2d 783 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1966)
United States Ex Rel. Fink v. Tod
1 F.2d 246 (Second Circuit, 1924)
Pittsburgh, Ft. Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. Gillespie
63 N.E. 845 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Naumann v. Board of City Canvassers
41 N.W. 267 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
Robertson v. State ex rel. Smith
10 N.E. 582 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
People ex rel. Dafoe v. Harshaw
26 N.W. 879 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Doran v. DeLong
48 Mich. 552 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1882)
Simon v. Portland Common Council
9 Or. 437 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1881)
Alter v. Simpson
46 Mich. 138 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)