Alter v. Simpson
46 Mich. 138
Opinion
The office in question in this case is that of alderman of the city of Detroit. The question is whether this court can review the decision of the council in determining, upon the facts, that the respondent was elected. On a similar case we have held that we have no power to interfere. People v. FitzGerald 41 Mich. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alter v. Simpson, 46 Mich. 138 (Mich. 1881).
46 Mich. 138 (Alter v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Connor Berdy v. Sonja Buffa
928 N.W.2d 204 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2019)
Sinclair v. Common Council
147 N.W. 942 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Robertson v. State ex rel. Smith
10 N.E. 582 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
People ex rel. Dafoe v. Harshaw
26 N.W. 879 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)