People ex rel. Caswell v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Caswell v. New York State Division of Parole

273 A.D.2d 927, 711 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 A.D.2d 927 (People ex rel. Caswell v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Caswell v. New York State Division of Parole, 273 A.D.2d 927, 711 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Relator contends that he was improperly denied a preliminary parole revocation hearing on the allegation that he was convicted of a crime in Illinois. That contention was rendered moot by the determination revoking relator’s parole following a final parole revocation hearing (see, People ex rel. Wagner v Travis, 273 AD2d 849 [decided herewith]; People ex rel. McCummings v DeAngelo, 259 AD2d 794, 794-795, lv denied 93 NY2d 810; People ex rel. Chavis v McCoy, 236 AD2d 892). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Relator contends that he was improperly denied a preliminary parole revocation hearing on the allegation that he was convicted of a crime in Illinois. That contention was rendered moot by the determination revoking relator’s parole following a final parole revocation hearing (see, People ex rel. Wagner v Travis, 273 AD2d 849 [decided herewith]; People ex rel. McCummings v DeAngelo, 259 AD2d 794, 794-795, lv denied 93 NY2d 810; People ex rel. Chavis v McCoy, 236 AD2d 892). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 927, 711 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-caswell-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack