People ex rel. Brussel v. Brussel

279 A.D. 859, 110 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 859 (People ex rel. Brussel v. Brussel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Brussel v. Brussel, 279 A.D. 859, 110 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinions

Per Guriam.

Upon the present record we are of the opinion that the order as to custody should be affirmed.

It has been called to our attention, however, that since the Referee heard this case, new developments have taken place, particularly the remarriages of the parents, which might constitute such change of circumstances as to warrant a further hearing. If either party be so advised, such party is free to apply for such relief. If and when any rehearing is had, the court should consider whether the age and maturity of the children warrant taking proof of their wishes as to custody, and the court could give such weight thereto as it deems for their best interests. The order should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodd v. Dodd
93 Misc. 2d 641 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Miller v. Miller
258 A.2d 89 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)
State v. Graham
322 S.W.2d 188 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1959)
People ex rel. Brussel v. Brussel
280 A.D. 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 859, 110 N.Y.S.2d 335, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-brussel-v-brussel-nyappdiv-1952.