People ex rel. Bray v. Deegan
This text of 32 A.D.2d 940 (People ex rel. Bray v. Deegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 20, 1968, which dismissed the writ. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We affirm the dismissal of the writ on the ground that no reason of practicality or necessity was asserted to justify review of the matters raised by habeas corpus while relator’s consolidated appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of an application for coram nobis relief is pending (People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N Y 2d 257, 262; People ex rel. Blyden v. Denno, 28 A D 2d 683, cert. den. 390 U. S. 966; People ex rel. Singleton v. Deegan, 31 A D 2d 769). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 940, 303 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-bray-v-deegan-nyappdiv-1969.