People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley
48 N.E. 688, 167 Ill. 638
Opinion
announced the opinion of the court:
By this motion respondent Joseph Kipley asks, first, for leave to withdraw his plea; second, to file an amended answer; and third, to file a supplemental answer. Nothing more is before us than the bare motion. No showing has been made nor reasons filed in support of the motion, and we are unable to say whether the motion should be allowed or not, and it must therefore be overruled.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley, 48 N.E. 688, 167 Ill. 638 (Ill. 1897).
48 N.E. 688 (People ex rel. Akin v. Kipley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Jackson
Appellate Court of Illinois, 2006
Public Service Commission v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad
133 N.E. 492 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1922)
Borror v. Carrier
73 N.E. 123 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)
Walker v. Towle
53 L.R.A. 749 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)