People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny

537 F.2d 384
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 1976
DocketNo. 72-2905
StatusPublished

This text of 537 F.2d 384 (People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny, 537 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

The disposition of the above appeal was withdrawn from submission and deferred pending the disposition of two cases pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. Those cases have now been decided and are entitled Hancock v. Train, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976); and Seeber v. Alabama, -U.S.--, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 48 L.Ed.2d 384 (1976). It is, therefore, now ordered that the above appeal be submitted for disposition.

Upon the authority of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hancock, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hancock v. Train
426 U.S. 167 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Seeber v. Alabama
426 U.S. 932 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
537 F.2d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-air-pollution-control-officer-v-stastny-ca9-1976.