People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny

Ninth Circuit

People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny

537 F.2d 384

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 15, 1976·No. No. 72-2905·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

The disposition of the above appeal was withdrawn from submission and deferred pending the disposition of two cases pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. Those cases have now been decided and are entitled Hancock v. Train, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976); and Seeber v. Alabama, -U.S.--, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 48 L.Ed.2d 384 (1976). It is, therefore, now ordered that the above appeal be submitted for disposition.

Upon the authority of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hancock, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

The disposition of the above appeal was withdrawn from submission and deferred pending the disposition of two cases pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. Those cases have now been decided and are entitled Hancock v. Train, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976); and Seeber v. Alabama, -U.S.--, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 48 L.Ed.2d 384 (1976). It is, therefore, now ordered that the above appeal be submitted for disposition.

Upon the authority of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hancock, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny, 537 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

537 F.2d 384 (People ex rel. Air Pollution Control Officer v. Stastny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related