Pentcholov v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 28, 2016
Docket14-414
StatusUnpublished

This text of Pentcholov v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Pentcholov v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pentcholov v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2016).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-414V (Not to be published)

***************************** * IVANKA PENTCHOLOV, as mother and * natural guardian of minor, A.P., * * Petitioner, * Filed: March 4, 2016 * v. * Decision by Stipulation; Damages; * Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular * pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Meningococcal vaccine; HUMAN SERVICES, * Aplastic Anemia * Respondent. * * ***************************** Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On May 14, 2014, Petitioner Ivanka Pentcholov filed a petition on behalf of her daughter seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Petitioner alleges that A.P. suffered aplastic anemia and its related sequelae as a result of receiving the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) and meningococcal vaccines on August 20, 2012.

Respondent denies that A.P.’s medical problems were caused by the receipt of the Tdap and/or meningococcal vaccines. Nonetheless both parties, while maintaining their above-stated

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my action in this case, I will post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002) (current version at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2014)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the posted decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to the public. (Id.) 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. ' 300aa-10 to ' 300aa-34 (2012). positions, agreed in a stipulation filed March 4, 2016, that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract (as provided for in ¶ 10 of the Stipulation, paid to the Life Insurance Company which in turn will pay (among other things) $101,617.75 as a lump sum to A.P. on August 11, 2019.

Stipulation ¶ 8.

I approve a Vaccine Program award as described above. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice renouncing their right to seek review.

2 Case 1:14-vv-00414-UNJ Document 36 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) IVANKA PENTCHOLOV, as mother and ) natural guard ian of minor, A.P., ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 14-4 14V ECF ) v. ) Special Master Corcoran ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) - -- - - - - - - - - - - - )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the fo llowing matters:

I. Petitioner, lvanka Pentcholov, filed a petition for vaccine compensation on behalf of

her daughter, A.P. ("AP"), under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program , 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-l 0 to 34 (the " Vaccine Program .. ). The petition seeks compensation for injuries

alleged ly related to AP' s receipt of th e tetanus-diphtheria-acellu lar pe1tussis ("'Tdap") and

meningococcal vaccines, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Tab le (the "Tab le''), 42

C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. AP received the vaccines on August 20, 20 12.

3. The vaccines were admin istered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that, as a result of receiving the vacci nes, AP suffered from ap lastic

anemia and its related sequelae, and that AP experienced the residual effects o f thi s injury for

more th an six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settl ement of a civil action Case 1:14-vv-00414-UNJ Document 36 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 6

for damages on behalf of AP as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccines caused or sign ificant ly aggravated AP· s alleged

medical condition, any of her on going symptoms. or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties neve11heless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of thi s Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment refl ecting a decision consistent with

the terms of th is Stipu lation, and after petitioner has fi led an electi on to receive compensati on

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)( l ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services wi ll issue

the fo llowing vaccine compensation payment for all damages that would be avai lab le under 42

U.S.C. §300aa- l 5(a):

An amount suffici ent to purchase the annuity contract descri bed in paragraph I0 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the an nuity wi ll be purchased (the " Life Insurance Company").

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000.00 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security va luation reserve. The Life In surance Company

must have one of the fo ll owing ratin gs from two o f the fo ll owing ratin g organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r. or A+s;

b. Moody's Investor Service Claim s Payin g Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa I, or Aaa;

c. Standard and Poor's Corporation In surer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA -, AA, AA+, or AAA ;

d. Fitch Cred it Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Abil ity Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

I0. The Secretary of Health and Human Services agrees to purchase an annuity contract

from the Life Insurance Company for the benefit of AP, pursuant to which the Life Insurance

2 Case 1:14-vv-00414-UNJ Document 36 Filed 03/04/16 Page 3 of 6

Company wi ll agree to make a payment to AP for all damages that would be ava ilable under 42

U.S.C. §300aa- 15(a), as fol lows:

a. $ 10 1,6 17.75 payable in a certain lump sum on August 11, 20 19.

The payment provided for in thi s paragraph I0 shall be made as set forth above. Should AP

predecease the certain lump sum payment set fo rth above, said certain lump sum payment shall

be made to her estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pentcholov v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pentcholov-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2016.